123456yang 2021-11-02

Clearly, it was just a factor influenced by manipulation, but I thought I was really a prestigious publication.

yk6551953 2021-09-28

I am the "haha" in the WeChat group that you mentioned, and what you said is correct.

东方月初 2021-09-28

It took more than three months, with two reviewers both recommending major revisions, but the editor rejected it. I regret not listening to the advice of the team members and submitting to other ceramic journals. I wasted three months for nothing.

科研77 2021-08-25

I don't understand why both reviewers' comments were mostly positive, yet the paper was still rejected...

Π大※ 2021-08-09

Four reviewers, two minor revisions, one major revision, and one rejection.

The editor ultimately gave a rejection, and I am very upset. The threshold for this journal is so high.

LHDDSB 2021-08-08

This journal is completely a plaything for certain individuals. It is said that they have a special group to manipulate citations and impact factor. The number of articles published each year is very low, and it is estimated that submissions from ordinary people will not even be reviewed. Originally, I had hoped to write my articles on the land of our motherland, but the waters of domestic SCI are truly too deep. I submitted an article to this journal without it being reviewed, and in the end, it received an impact factor of just around 20.

cly 2021-05-18

The text translates to: "Under review" has changed to "reviewers assigned" for two weeks now, and the dates have also changed during the "reviewers assigned" period. What is happening? Did the reviewers refuse to review?

appletree 2021-04-28

Is this journal an open-access magazine? Is there any page charge required?

jiamaolee 2021-03-18

The entire process was very fast, except for the reviewing, which usually takes more than 3.