Verified Reviews - IEEE Access
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

我要糖 2023-07-14

Continuing from the previous text:

Between May 24th and June 12th, two reminders were sent, and both received template responses. However, it could be inferred from the reviews and a review that there are still a few reviewers who have not responded.

On June 17th, 2023, the second round of reviews was received, with one acceptance and one rejection (but with encouragement to resubmit). The editor strongly recommended resubmission. (Only then did I realize that two reviewers were changed!)

On June 19th, the manuscript was resubmitted for the third time, and on the same day, a reminder was sent to the external reviewer.

On June 21st, external review commenced.

Meanwhile, reminders were sent on June 26th, June 28th, and June 30th. The first two reminders informed me that some reviewers had not responded yet, while the third reminder stated that they were already waiting for the editor's response. On July 1st, a letter was written to the editor.

On July 3rd, the final acceptance notice was received!

qiguobin 2023-07-14

The text translates to: "On 7.14, the acceptance was displayed, and both reviewers have no comments on the review. Please make the final revisions."

songhost 2023-07-14

Two reviewers provided nearly 30 suggestions, all of which were addressed in the revisions without any issues. The paper has greatly improved as a result.

Y 2023-07-13

What is an appropriate rate for plagiarism check before submitting a paper? Which plagiarism checker is more accurate? I'm a bit anxious about my first submission.

Mustbeimproved 2023-07-12

It may be that no reviewer was found.

top不是梦 2023-07-12

I am too, may I ask if the original poster is reapplying or applying for the first time?

rymandlx 2023-07-11

The first trial took 2 months, and it has been 16 days since the second trial. Now it's really too slow.

XIxxxxxx HU 2023-07-11

Received an email stating "we have started the review process for your article", but it has been in the "submitted" status and has not appeared as "under review". What does this mean?

好难过xcx 2023-07-11

I received it on May 15th, and it has already been retrieved. CITIC has confirmed that everything has been opened.

wfSCI 2023-07-11

The email didn't mention it, but please try to do it as quickly as possible.

fei24 2023-07-10

Excuse me, for the second review, how long have you been waiting? Sorry for the inconvenience.

swz 2023-07-10

Are you urging for the draft? The reviewer hasn't finished it yet. Their usual response is this.

swz 2023-07-10

Yes, it has slowed down a lot now.

fei24 2023-07-10

Excuse me, is there any restriction on the modification time? I didn't see it in the email, it seems.

fei24 2023-07-10

Does he have a time limit for modifications on this?

rymandlx 2023-07-08

Re-submit with a new ID number, a new editor, and restart the entire process again.

rymandlx 2023-07-08

4 days, the first time submitting for 4 days, resubmitting for 4 days to start the review process.

我要糖 2023-07-07

The reviewer has not yet replied with their comments on the manuscript to the editor.

pence 2023-07-04

The text translates to: "Your manuscript is still undergoing the peer review process. At this time, the editor is still waiting to receive reviews. One review is due within a week. The editor is doing everything possible to expedite the process."

XIxxxxxx HU 2023-07-02

I originally didn't want to complain, but I couldn't help it.
They will reassign the ID, send an external review email, and the editor will be different from before, while the reviewers will be new.
The first submission was rejected by two people and resubmitted, taking 60 days.
The second submission had two different reviewers, one rejected and one accepted, taking 30 days.
The problem is that the person who rejected my submission didn't provide any feedback. They gave four comments, three of which I clearly explained in the paper, and one asked if my method could be applied to another paper (which is completely unrelated to my research direction)...
I don't know the specific mechanism of this journal's peer review process. All I know is that I am a second-year graduate student and I received an invitation to review for this journal, but I don't understand that paper at all.

99c 2023-07-01

Me too, after resubmitting, they changed the editor for me again, and the assigned ID number for the article also changed. Will the reviewer also be changed? Will all of these change if I resubmit? I want to ask if you guys do it the same way.

wfSCI 2023-06-29

About one and a half months.

fei24 2023-06-29

Excuse me, how long have you been auditing?

robot5555 2023-06-28

I received a reply from EIC the same night I emailed them, saying that the re-submission review process takes longer than submitting anew. Now, I am assigning AE to prepare for external review. Indeed, pushing EIC is more effective than ADM.

期刊中中中 2023-06-28

I have been waiting for review for 12 days. No need to rush, brother.

robot5555 2023-06-27

I have been submitting my manuscript for 9 days, but I haven't received the external review email yet. I have also sent emails to the administrative and editorial teams, but they have all been read and not replied to. Frustrating!!!

robot5555 2023-06-27

I have been submitting my manuscript for 9 days, but I have not received an email for external review. I have also emailed the administrative staff (adm) and the editor-in-chief (eic), but they have read the emails and not replied. It's frustrating!!

rymandlx 2023-06-27

2023, 3.17 submission, there was an ID on the same day, it should have passed the formal review.
2023.3.21, We have started the review process for your article, but wanted to mention the "2023 IEEE Access Best Video Award Part 1" which is detailed below:
It should have started the external review.
2023.5.17 received an email, 3 reviewers, 2 minor revisions, one rejection, the email encourages resubmission.
we encourage you to address the reviewers' concerns
Please be advised that authors are only permitted to resubmit their article ONCE.
Things have been delaying, so on 2023.6.25, I resubmitted and am waiting for news.

Tao王 2023-06-27

The guy upstairs has a different opinion. Don't just look at "under review," sending you an email means it has been submitted for review. In reality...

swz 2023-06-27

So fast? Does resubmission mean going through the process again like the first submission?

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started