Chris PENG 2023-07-19

Is it this slow now? Do we have to go through several rounds of revisions and resubmissions? Because each time we resubmit, we get a different reviewer. How many reviewers' opinions do you get each time?

swz 2023-07-19

2023.5.30 Submission
2023.6.15 Rejection, resubmission after rejection
2023.7.6 Resubmission
2023.7.18 Rejection, encouraged to resubmit
2023.7.19 Resubmission
Is this journal so strict with its review process? They keep rejecting and asking for resubmission. The first time, both reviewers rejected it; the second time, one accepted and one rejected it. I'm really frustrated. Hoping for a positive outcome.

我要糖 2023-07-19

When you remind the contact person about the manuscript, he will reply to you: "Your manuscript is still undergoing the peer review process. At this time, the editor is still waiting to receive a review." It can be inferred that only one reviewer has not responded yet.

robot5555 2023-07-19

Where can I see if it is reviews or just a review? Mine only shows "Under Review".

swz 2023-07-18

What's the current situation now? Any further updates?

swz 2023-07-18

So, how are you doing now?

swz 2023-07-18

Did you win? How's it going afterwards?

swz 2023-07-18

How is it now?

swz 2023-07-18

Can't you see? You can only see the final submitted file.

Y 2023-07-18

Hello, may I ask what is the appropriate maximum plagiarism rate before submitting an article?

Y 2023-07-18

May I ask what is the appropriate maximum plagiarism rate before submitting an article, dear author?

巴黎 2023-07-17

So is this an external audit, or what kind of status is it?

或许遗忘 2023-07-17

You can log in to your account to check the status. It has a function for checking the status and another one for submitting contributions.

或许遗忘 2023-07-17

I want to ask you, after modifying the response, if you can see the content of the response in the PDF file generated in "view submission." Currently, I can only see the content of the clean draft and the yellow highlighted draft.

或许遗忘 2023-07-17

I have been in this state for a long time too.

blgbb 2023-07-17

May I ask if "催稿" means contacting the Adm by sending an email?

blgbb 2023-07-17

Translate the following text into English: "Resubmitted on January 7th. Received an email on July 7th saying 'We have started the review process for your article,' but the website still shows 'submitted' status. What's going on?"

巴黎 2023-07-17

"Under review" is still the status until now. Should I remind them? I haven't received the email to start reviewing your paper, I only received the email with my ID number, and it became "under review". It has been half a month and it's still the same. What exactly does this status mean?

巴黎 2023-07-17

Under review is still the current status until now. Should I remind them? I didn't receive the email about starting the review of your paper. I only received an email giving me an ID number, and it changed to "under review". It has been half a month and it has been like this all along. What is the actual status?

巴黎 2023-07-17

"Under review" is still the status up until now. Should I remind them? I haven't received the email informing me that they have started reviewing your paper. I only received the email with my ID number, and it changed to "under review." It has been half a month and it has remained like this.

blgbb 2023-07-17

My status is also like this. May I ask if it has been updated?

或许遗忘 2023-07-15

I would like to ask everyone, after making modifications to the response, can you see the content of the response in the PDF file generated in the "View Submission"? Currently, I can only see the content of the clean manuscript and the yellow highlighted manuscript.

我要糖 2023-07-15

We have initiated the external review meeting and are sending you an email regarding the "2023 IEEE Access Best Video Award Part 1." The details are as follows:

swz 2023-07-14

Is it much slower to resubmit a rejected article compared to the first submission?

swz 2023-07-14

How can I find the contact information of the reviewer? Why is the second review taking so long?

巴黎 2023-07-14

I saw them saying to send it for external review by sending an email for review, but I didn't receive it. The last status was the given ID number. So, what is my status? Is it for internal review?

巴黎 2023-07-14

I have been under review since July 5th and I am still in this status. Should I urge or not?

我要糖 2023-07-14

Continuation:

2023.7.3 Final draft uploaded, author confirmed, and received payment notification.
2023.7.4 Made the payment.
2023.7.6 Can be previewed in the advance access area on IEEE XPLORE.
2023.7.7 Proofreading.
2023.7.14 Officially published on IEEE XPLORE. (But still not searchable on SSCI)

The whole process took more than three months, which was quite bumpy. The reviewers' comments were fair and knowledgeable. The only annoyance was the change of reviewers in the middle. Everything else was relatively good, and the contact person replied promptly.
Make sure to push for the manuscript! Make sure to push for the manuscript! Make sure to push for the manuscript! Because the contact person is the one to be pushed, not the editor, so no need to worry!

我要糖 2023-07-14

Continuing from the previous text:

There were two reminders sent on 5.24 and 6.12, respectively, but both received template replies. However, it can be inferred from the reviews and a review that there are still a few reviewers who have not responded.

On 2023.6.17, the second round of review comments were received, with one acceptance and one rejection (but encouraging resubmission). The editor strongly recommended resubmission. (I just found out that two reviewers were changed!)

On 2023.6.19, the third resubmission was made, and external review was requested on the same day.

External review started on 2023.6.21.

In the meantime, reminders were sent, three times on 6.26/6.28/6.30. The first two reminders informed me that there were reviewers who had not provided feedback yet, and the third reminder stated that they were already waiting for the editor's response. I wrote to the editor on 7.1.

On 2023.7.3, the final acceptance notice was received!!

我要糖 2023-07-14

Continuation of the previous text:

2023.7.3 Final draft upload, author confirmation, receipt of payment notice.
2023.7.4 Payment made.
2023.7.6 Can be viewed in the "Early Access" area on IEEE Xplore.
2023.7.7 Proofreading.
2023.7.14 Officially published on IEEE Xplore (but not searchable on SSCI yet).

The whole process took more than three months and was quite tumultuous. The reviewers' comments were constructive and knowledgeable. The only annoyance was the change of reviewers in the middle. Other than that, everything went well, and the contact person responded quickly.

It is important to push for the manuscript! It is important to push for the manuscript! It is important to push for the manuscript! Because the contact person is the one to be reminded, not the editor, so there is no need to worry.