Verified Reviews - IEEE Access
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

孙局 2023-07-30

I would like to ask what should I do if I need to resubmit the revised draft that was not highlighted in yellow when submitted.

swz 2023-07-29

What's the matter with asking the editor?

冲好期刊 2023-07-29

Ah ah ah ah ah ah ah ah ah, I also feel the same. I'm so anxious waiting.

Chris PENG 2023-07-28

How long does the second trial usually take? It feels slower than the first trial, doesn't it?

swz 2023-07-27

I revised it and resubmitted it, but it was rejected again.

swz 2023-07-27

What does this mean? Should I revise it or resubmit it after rejection?

zwz98 2023-07-27

It has been a month and we are still in the peer review process. I wonder how long it takes for everyone's initial review.

Deitch 2023-07-27

Resubmitting after rejection, resubmission with revisions such as polishing is sure to succeed according to their feedback.

lagrange 2023-07-27

Yes, it is only sent to the corresponding author.

lqkaka 2023-07-27

May I ask, is the payment link only sent to the corresponding author?

swz 2023-07-26

7.19 Second Rejection Resubmission
7.26 Start Review Process

swz 2023-07-26

This journal seems to constantly reject and request resubmission now, it's really difficult to handle.

swz 2023-07-26

Really? But I don't understand why this journal keeps rejecting and resubmitting.

lagrange 2023-07-24

The time you spent on the first review is one-fourth of mine. The overall time is not considered long. Nowadays, it generally takes about three months for access.

swz 2023-07-24

Wow, you finished it so quickly! You resubmitted the rejected manuscript and completed it in one go. I'm still waiting for my second resubmission after being rejected, it's really tough.

lagrange 2023-07-24

4.13 Submission
4.17 Received external review email, started reviewing
5.9 Reminder, received response saying some reviewers have not completed the review, still looking for reviewers
5.19 Three reviewers, 20+ comments, all Reject (updates required before resubmission), overall good
There was a delay in the middle for revisions
7.2 Resubmission
7.20 Reminder, waiting for editor's comments
7.24 Accepted
(The above is the submission process, hope it helps everyone. The overall speed is relatively slow, not like what is said online, where all papers are accepted. This is mainly for those who submit translations or have a fellow authorship and are not highly regarded.)
Does anyone know how the subsequent online process is like?

ccccc1cc 2023-07-24

Hello, may I ask if the procedure for reapplying has changed a bit compared to before? Throughout the submission process, I haven't encountered the requirement to fill in the previous article number or asked whether I have previously applied. Or is it possible that I made a mistake? Thank you.

robot5555 2023-07-24

Yeah, maybe it's because I was on the warning list before, so now the review process takes longer. It's difficult to be accepted before the second review. There are also more rejections. It feels like it's becoming stricter and stricter.

yyd321 2023-07-24

The review process is still very fast, both the first and second reviews are completed within one month.

swz 2023-07-24

How do you know that? I feel like I've been constantly rejected and have to resubmit, which means I have to make several revisions. It's really difficult.

top不是梦 2023-07-24

Yes, this journal has recently become much stricter in reviewing. Many submissions typically go through three to four months from the first submission to acceptance.

bmeeeeeee 2023-07-22

There is no requirement to extend the reapplication deadline, you can directly send an email to inquire. In theory, it is okay to continue with the application.

swz 2023-07-22

I envy you, as you only need one revision, while I keep receiving rejections one after another. It seems that the fewer suggestions I make, the more likely my work gets rejected.

mjc0525 2023-07-22

The first time I was encouraged to resubmit was on 6.17. There was no deadline mentioned in the email at that time. Then, I resubmitted on 7.18, and I noticed that the status changed from "encouraged to resubmit" to "rejected." However, I can still submit it again. I see that you have also exceeded one month. May I ask if you have emailed the editor to request an extension for the resubmission deadline?

bmeeeeeee 2023-07-22

2023.4.21 Submission

2023.4.25 External review

2023.5.9 First review with two rejections, the second reviewer should be an expert in the field, and the issues are all pain points...

2023.6.20 Second review submission, a total of 20 suggestions to be addressed point by point, and more experiments added

2023.6.23 Second review resubmission

2023.7.11 Two accepts, accepted, with the second reviewer still providing seven suggestions, really difficult to resolve... but no need to add experiments anymore.

bmeeeeeee 2023-07-22

Encountered two relatively professional reviewers, the process was bumpy but the outcome was acceptable.

Chris PENG 2023-07-21

Does it take three to four months for this journal now? It's exaggerated, or is it over 10,000 yuan for open access?

robot5555 2023-07-21

7.20 accepted, after three rounds of review. From March to July, finally got it.

swz 2023-07-20

I have given feedback twice in total. The first time, there were a total of six opinions from two people. The second time, one was accepted and one was rejected. The rejected one was given two suggestions. It took two months in total, and in the end, I am still submitting it. I really can't bear it anymore.

狄云 2023-07-20

This is my first submission. There were three reviewers: one suggested minor revisions, one recommended resubmission after making changes, and one discouraged resubmission. The editor advised against resubmission. Can I still make changes and resubmit in this situation?

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More