Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment

Journal Title
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment

B ENG GEOL ENVIRON

ISSN / eISSN
1435-9529 / 1435-9537
Aims and Scope
Engineering geology is defined in the statutes of the IAEG as the science devoted to the investigation, study and solution of engineering and environmental problems which may arise as the result of the interaction between geology and the works or activities of man, as well as of the prediction of and development of measures for the prevention or remediation of geological hazards. Engineering geology embraces:

• the applications/implications of the geomorphology, structural geology, and hydrogeological conditions of geological formations;

• the characterisation of the mineralogical, physico-geomechanical, chemical and hydraulic properties of all earth materials involved in construction, resource recovery and environmental change;

• the assessment of the mechanical and hydrological behaviour of soil and rock masses;

• the prediction of changes to the above properties with time;

• the determination of the parameters to be considered in the stability analysis of engineering works and earth masses.
Subject Area

ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL

ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL

GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

CiteScore
7.30 View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category Quartile Rank
Earth and Planetary Sciences - Geology Q1 #25/284
Earth and Planetary Sciences - Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology Q1 #30/211
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2023) Quartile
ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL - SCIE Q3
ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL - SCIE Q2
GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY - SCIE Q1
H-index
47
Country/Area of Publication
GERMANY
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Publication Frequency
Quarterly
Year Publication Started
1970
Annual Article Volume
504
Open Access
NO
Contact
SPRINGER HEIDELBERG, TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, HEIDELBERG, GERMANY, D-69121
Verified Reviews
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.
I submitted my manuscript twice. From March 2nd to September 1st of the 21st year, there was no response. I thought maybe the editor-in-chief was sick and unable to work (just guessing). So, I sent an email to the journal's work email suggesting to withdraw the submission and resubmit. On September 3rd, I submitted again, and the status immediately changed to "with editor-in-chief." I thought maybe something good was going to happen, but after a week, they returned with a request to change the format and asked if the paper had been preprinted before, requesting me to provide comments.
Then I wrote a response with comments and, surprisingly, another two months passed. On October 30th, they sent me a rejection email, stating that the editor-in-chief was surprised to see comments on the first submission. This is ridiculous because they asked for preprint comments.
I suggest everyone never submit to this journal. It is extremely unprofessional. I couldn't bear it and sent an email to the editorial department, strongly condemning the inaction of Arindam Basu and others as the editor-in-chief. It is clearly intentional harassment of our Chinese submissions.
Remember not to submit to this journal. Absolutely do not submit!
2021-10-31
Posted on September 23, 2021
Major revision on December 1st, with 12 comments from 2 reviewers. Both reviewers seem to be foreigners, and their comments are very professional.
Revised manuscript returned on December 29th.
Accepted directly on January 25, 2022.
Discussing my own submission experience: Although I have also submitted to EI and SCI journals in both China and abroad, it is obvious that foreign journals are much more formal. The main difference lies in the reviewers and editors. Foreign reviewers (including Chinese reviewers) will provide rejection comments in a very professional manner. It is clear that they have carefully read your paper and their comments are very insightful. It is difficult to respond, as I took 3 days to answer one comment from a reviewer when I submitted to BOEG. You know they are right, but it is just hard to respond.
On the other hand, some Chinese EI journals have impolite reviewers who quickly make comments without much thought. If they don't want to review, they can simply decline, but they should not make baseless claims.
2022-01-27

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now