Brain Sciences

Journal website Submission website
Ask Question
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Journal Search
  4. Journal Details
Journal Title
Brain Sciences

BRAIN SCI

ISSN / eISSN
2076-3425 / 2076-3425
Aims and Scope
Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
Subject Area

NEUROSCIENCES

CiteScore
3.90 View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category Quartile Rank
Neuroscience - General Neuroscience Q3 #65/110
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2023) Quartile
NEUROSCIENCES - SCIE Q3
Country/Area of Publication
Switzerland
Publisher
MDPI (Basel, Switzerland)
Year Publication Started
2011
Annual Article Volume
1667
Open Access
YES
Contact
ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, BASEL, SWITZERLAND, CH-4052
Verified Reviews
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.
Two months after being hired, I received major revisions comments about three weeks after submitting my work. I sent an email requesting major revisions (one major revision and three minor revisions) to be made. There were four reviewers, one of whom was quite busy, and it took three days for the fourth reviewer to provide their comments after the major revisions were given. I was given ten days to make the revisions and I sent them back on the ninth day. A week later, I received notification for minor revisions. It was the first article in the series, and although it was open-source, I was still quite happy.
2022-08-22
Submitted on 7.12, the review process took two months, claiming that the foreign professor was on vacation. Four reviewers were assigned, with a ten-day revision period. After the revisions were made, it has been over 50 days with a pending editor decision. I have reminded the editor, and their response was that they are currently searching for a new academic editor. This is outrageous...
2022-10-30
View All Reviews

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started
Webinars Posters Questions Hubs Funding Journals Articles Connect Collections Reviewers About Us FAQs Mobile App Privacy Policy Terms of Use
© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.