4.7 Article

Palaeomagnetism of late Cretaceous sediments from southern Tibet: Evidence for the consistent palaeolatitudes of the southern margin of Eurasia prior to the collision with India

期刊

GONDWANA RESEARCH
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 53-63

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gr.2011.08.003

关键词

Lhasa terrane; Paleomagnetism; Late Cretaceous; Collision; Convergence

资金

  1. NSFC [40874030]
  2. China Geological Survey [1212011121264]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Twenty sites were drilled in the late Cretaceous Shexing Formation for palaeomagnetic studies in the Lhasa terrane near the locality of Maxiang (29.9 degrees N/90.7 degrees E). The stepwise thermal demagnetizations successfully isolated high unblocking temperature characteristic directions. The tilt-corrected mean direction is D/I=350.8 degrees/32.1 degrees with alpha(95)=8.1 degrees and N=20 sites, corresponding to a paleopole at 75.0 degrees N, 306.7 degrees E with A(95)=6.8 degrees. Positive fold tests indicate a primary origin for the characteristic remanence. Based on previous Cretaceous data mainly from the Takena Formation and Paleocene data from the Linzizong volcanic rocks near the city of Lhasa, the latitude of the southern margin of Asia is located at about 15 degrees N, and yields a stable position of the Lhasa terrane during Cretaceous and Paleocene. Compared with expected paleomagnetic directions from the stable India and Eurasia blocks, the collision palaeolatitude further implies the total latitudinal convergence was accommodated by 1700 +/- 800 km (16.2 +/- 7.6 degrees) between southern Tibet and stable Eurasia and 1500 +/- 830 km (14.4 +/- 7.9 degrees) between southern Tibet and stable India since the collision of India and Eurasia. A collision age between c. 54 and 47 Ma was determined using the results for the southern margin of Eurasia according to our new data and the extent of 'Greater India'. (C) 2011 International Association for Gondwana Research. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据