Gondwana Research

期刊官网 投稿通道
提出问题
  1. 首页
  2. 学术期刊
  3. 期刊搜索
  4. 期刊详情
期刊名
Gondwana Research

GONDWANA RES

ISSN / eISSN
1342-937X
目标和范围
Gondwana Research (GR) is an International Journal aimed to promote high quality research publications on all topics related to solid Earth, particularly with reference to the origin and evolution of continents, continental assemblies and their resources. GR is an "all earth science" journal with no restrictions on geological time, terrane or theme and covers a wide spectrum of topics in geosciences such as geology, geomorphology, palaeontology, structure, petrology, geochemistry, stable isotopes, geochronology, economic geology, exploration geology, engineering geology, geophysics, and environmental geology among other themes, and provides an appropriate forum to integrate studies from different disciplines and different terrains. In addition to regular articles and thematic issues, the journal invites high profile state-of-the-art reviews on thrust area topics for its column, 'GR FOCUS'. Focus articles include short biographies and photographs of the authors. Short articles (within ten printed pages) for rapid publication reporting important discoveries or innovative models of global interest will be considered under the category 'GR LETTERS'.
研究方向

地球科学：综合

CiteScore
10.40 查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 分区 排名
Earth and Planetary Sciences - Geology Q1 #8/284
Web of Science 核心合集
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2023) 分区
GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY - SCIE Q1
H-index
113
出版国家或地区
NETHERLANDS
出版商
Elsevier Inc.
出版周期
Bimonthly
年文章数
247
Open Access
NO
通讯方式
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
认证评论
注： 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。
There is a research paper that I personally believe is well done. Initially, I considered submitting it to GSAB, with two reviewers. However, one of the reviewers may have had a different opinion, so it was not possible. Later, I revised it and submitted it to GR. There were four reviewers and an associate editor, and they provided several pages of comments, which surprised me when I saw them. Previously, I had heard that this journal had some issues and its impact factor was inflated. However, when I saw the comments, I actually found them to be very rigorous. The reviewers, who are well-known young talents in the field, made objective suggestions that would help improve the paper. It took nearly half a year from start to publication. Overall, I feel that it was a very rigorous process. Regardless, I hope that there will be more and more good journals for us to choose from.
2021-07-26
Overall, this article went quite smoothly. One month after submission, the first round of reviewer comments came back. There were two reviewers in total, one suggested minor revisions and the other requested submission after making the necessary modifications. The associate editor asked for resubmission after the revisions were made. Based on the reviewer comments, it took one month to make the modifications before resubmitting. After resubmission, it took another month to receive minor revisions from the reviewer. The changes made this time were mostly minor language-related issues, such as word choice. There were two rounds of modifications related to a small issue with the reference to the appendix. Finally, the article was accepted successfully. The editor-in-chief and associate editor were very nice.
2021-08-20
查看所有评论

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started
研讨会 海报 问题 讨论圈 基金 学术期刊 论文评议 科研社交 资讯集成 审稿人 关于我们 常见问题 移动App 隐私条款 使用条款
© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.