4.3 Article

Dissemination of Cefotaxime-M-Producing Escherichia coli Isolates in Poultry Farms, But Not Swine Farms, in China

期刊

FOODBORNE PATHOGENS AND DISEASE
卷 7, 期 11, 页码 1387-1392

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2010.0581

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, China [2005DIB3J159, 2005DKA21202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to investigate the distribution of extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli isolates in swine and poultry farms in China. Rectal or cloaca swabs of swine and chicken were collected from four province-level regions of China, and E. coli isolates were recovered and tested for antimicrobial susceptibility. The isolates producing ESBLs were further characterized by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and sequence analysis of genes encoding beta-lactamases and class I integrons. In total, 156 and 224 E. coli isolates were recovered from rectal swabs of four swine farms and cloaca swabs of six chicken farms, respectively. Prevalence of resistant isolates was higher in chicken than in swine. Fifty-six isolates producing ESBLs were identified from chicken samples, but no ESBL-producing isolates were identified from swine samples. Of 56 ESBL-producing isolates, 54 isolates contained cefotaxime (CTX)-M type beta-lactamases, including bla(CTX-M-14) (n = 24), bla(CTX-M-65) (n = 13), bla(CTX-M-55) (n = 10), bla(CTX-M-24) (n = 3), bla(CTX-M-3) (n = 2), bla(CTX-M-15) (n = 1), and bla(CTX-M-64) (n = 1). Among 54 E. coli isolates containing bla(CTX-M), 11 PFGE clusters and 42 PFGE patterns were identified. More importantly, more than three-fourth of the ESBL-producing isolates in chicken were also resistant to ciprofloxacin. Our data demonstrated that chicken had become an important reservoir of blaCTX-M in China. Detailed molecular comparison of plasmids and genomes of isolates from various sources will help to better define the transmission dynamics of bla(CTX-M) between humans and food-producing animals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据