4.7 Article

Temperature and cysteine addition effect on formation of sunflower hydrolysate Maillard reaction products and corresponding influence on sensory characteristics assessed by partial least square regression

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 57, 期 -, 页码 242-258

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.01.030

关键词

Sunflower peptides; Maillard reaction; Sensory attributes; Partial least square regression

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31071602]
  2. Agricultural Science and Technology Achievements Transformation Project [2011GB23600012]
  3. Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Maillard reaction products (MRPs) were prepared from sunflower peptide and D-xylose with or without L-cysteine (PXC or PX) by heating over a range of temperatures (80-140 degrees C) for 2.0 h and a pH of 7.4 and subsequently the products were sensory evaluated. Partial least square regression (PLSR) was performed to analyze the correlation among data of quantitative sensory descriptive analysis, peptides, GC-MS and free amino acid (FAA) data of PXCs and PXs. Results revealed that MRPs formed at 120 degrees C with cysteine addition (PXC-120) had greater meat-like flavor, mouthfulness and continuity taste compared to other MRPs. Molecular weight distribution showed that the presence of cysteine inhibited the low molecular weight (LMW) peptide cross-linking but accelerated the high molecular weight (HMW) peptide degradation with increasing temperature. Furthermore, results showed that the peptide above 5 kDa has a significant negative contribution to sensory attributes of PXCs, while the peptide between 1 and 5 kDa showed no significant but positive influence on PX sensory attributes. Sulfur containing compounds showed a significant and positive correlation to sensory attributes of PXCs while nitrogen containing compounds and furan were significantly but negatively correlated to sensory attributes of PXCs. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据