4.7 Article

The influence of post-harvest UV-C hormesis on lycopene, β-carotene, and phenolic content and antioxidant activity of breaker tomatoes

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 49, 期 1, 页码 296-302

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2012.07.018

关键词

Tomato; Bioactive compound; Lycopene; Carotene; Phenolic compound; Antioxidant activity; UV-C hormesis

资金

  1. EU VI Frame Programme through the IP Lycocard [2006-016213]
  2. Ministry of Education and Science of the Spanish Government [AGL-2006-26965-E]
  3. Fundacion Seneca of the Murcia Regional Government
  4. Tropicana Alvalle S.L. (PepsiCo Group)
  5. Juver Alimentacion S.L.U. (Conserve Italia)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the present study was to determine the levels of beta-carotene, lycopene and its isomers, and total and individual phenolic compounds in tomatoes treated with different levels of UV-C radiation (UV-C hormesis). Mature green tomatoes (breaker stage) were exposed to different doses of UV-C irradiation (1.0, 3.0 and 12.2 kJ/m(2)). After UV treatment, tomatoes were stored at room temperature for 8 d, and then analyzed for bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity. Exposed tomatoes were compared with control samples stored at different conditions (darkness and day/night cycle). The lycopene content in breaker tomatoes increased almost twofold following UV light treatments, while beta-carotene levels decreased, when treated samples were compared with the two control batches. Proportions of Z-lycopene also increased when the tomatoes were exposed to UV for more than 3 h. The UV treatments significantly increased the total phenolic content and the antioxidant capacity of treated tomatoes compared to untreated samples, but no clear effect was observed for individual phenolic compounds. These results suggest that UV-C irradiation of tomatoes could improve the beneficial effect of tomatoes for human health by increasing the levels of certain bioactive compounds. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据