4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Effect of flax addition on the flavor profile of muffins and snack bars

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 44, 期 8, 页码 2489-2496

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.01.044

关键词

Sensory evaluation; Snack bars; Muffins; Flavorings; Flaxseed; Clinical trials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Development of bakery products containing milled flaxseed, could have potential health benefits due to its high antioxidant, lignan and omega-3 fatty acid alpha linolenic acid content. However the effect of adding flaxseed, especially in the high amounts required for use as the food supplement in clinical trials, may affect the flavor characteristics. The objective of this study was to evaluate the flavor profile of different muffin and snack bar formulations with and without milled flaxseed. Three snack bar formulations and two muffin formulations with and without flaxseed were evaluated by ten and eleven trained assessors respectively. The intensity of seven aroma and eight flavor attributes for snack bars, and nine aroma and ten flavor attributes for muffins were measured on 15-cm line scales. Both the orange cranberry and apple spice muffin formulations with flaxseed had significantly lower sweetness and vanilla aroma and flavor intensities, and significantly higher grain/flax aroma and flavor, and bitter taste compared to the non-flax muffin. Of the two flavorings apple spice appeared to have the best potential, since the apple aroma and flavor were significantly higher for the flax muffin compared to the non-flax muffin. The orange cranberry, gingerbread raisin and cappuccino chocolate chip snack bar formulations with and without flaxseed showed no significant differences in intensities for the grain/flax aroma and flavor. The gingerbread raisin snack bar formulations showed no significant differences for any other attributes except for higher spice aroma in the flax sample, which makes it a promising flavoring option. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据