4.7 Article

Evaluation of Functional Properties in Protein Hydrolysates from Bluewing Searobin (Prionotus punctatus) Obtained with Different Microbial Enzymes

期刊

FOOD AND BIOPROCESS TECHNOLOGY
卷 4, 期 8, 页码 1399-1406

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11947-009-0301-0

关键词

Fish; Enzymatic hydrolysates; Alcalase; Flavourzyme; Functional properties

资金

  1. Coordination for Improvement of Superior Education Personal of Brazil (CAPES)
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of Brazil (CNPq)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enzymatic hydrolysis of proteins from low commercial value fish could be produced for uses like functional ingredients in a wide and always increasing zone of application in different food products. The objective of this work was to evaluate the functional properties and the amino acid profile of enzymatic hydrolysates from Bluewing searobin (Prionotus punctatus), using two microbial enzymes, Alcalase and Flavourzyme. The enzymatic hydrolysate obtained through the addition of the enzyme Alcalase reached the maximum solubility (42%) at pH 9, water holding capacity (WHC) of 2.4 g(water) g(protein)(-1), 4.5 g(oil) g(protein)(-1) of oil holding capacity (OHC) and an emulsifying activity index (EAI) of 54 m(2) g(solids)(-1) at pH 3. On the other hand, the hydrolysate obtained from Flavourzyme attained 38% of solubility at pH 9, 3.7 g(water) g(protein)(-1) and 5.5 g(oil) g(protein)(-1) for the holding capacities, and an EAI of 71 m(2) g(solids)(-1) at pH 11. The hydrolysate with Flavourzyme produced best results for WHC, OHC, and EAI because it had solubility lower than the hydrolysate of Alcalase. The hydrolysate produced by Alcalase had a higher amino acid content compared with Flavourzyme's hydrolysate. However, both showed a good essential amino acid amounts. In general, these results indicate the potential utilization of the hydrolysate from Bluewing searobin in food formulations for the direct human consumption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据