4.4 Article

Validation of an LC-MS/MS method for malachite green (MG), leucomalachite green (LMG), crystal violet (CV) and leucocrystal violet (LCV) residues in fish and shrimp

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19440049.2011.653695

关键词

shrimp; fish; malachite green; leucomalachite green; dyes; analysis; method validation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the simultaneous analyses of malachite green (MG), crystal violet (CV) and its major metabolites, leucomalachite green (LMG) and leucocrystal violet (LCV) residues in fish and shrimp samples has been validated. Fish and shrimp samples were extracted with citrate buffer/acetonitrile, and the extracts were purified on strong cation-exchange (SCX) solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridge. After conversion of LMG into MG using a post column oxidation reactor containing lead (IV) oxide (PbO2), the effluents were analysed. Residues were analysed using positive-ion electrospray ionisation (ESI). Identification and quantification of analytes were based on the ion transitions monitored by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). Validation of the method was carried out in accordance with the Decision 2002/657/EC, which establishes criteria and procedures for the validation of methods. The following parameters were determined: decision limit (CC alpha), detection capability (CC beta), linearity, accuracy, precision, selectivity, specificity and matrix effect. The decision limits (CC alpha) for MG, LMG, CV and LCV were 0.164, 0.161, 0.248 and 0.860 mu g kg(-1). The respective detection capabilities (CC beta) were 0.222, 0.218, 0.355 and 1.162 mu g kg(-1). Typical recoveries (intermediate precision) in shrimp, for MG, CV, LMG and LCV for 2.0 mu g kg(-1) level fortified samples using the optimised procedure were in the range 69%, 97%, 80.3% and 71.8%, respectively. The findings demonstrate the suitability of the method to detect simultaneously MG, CV and its metabolite (LMG and LCV) in fish and shrimp.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据