4.7 Article

Levels of the epidermal growth factor-like peptide amphiregulin in follicular fluid reflect the mode of triggering ovulation: a comparison between gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist and urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 95, 期 6, 页码 2034-2038

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.013

关键词

Amphiregulin; VEGF; GnRH agonist; GnRH antagonist; in vitro fertilization; triggering of ovulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To detect differences in follicular fluid (FF) levels of amphiregulin (AR), depending on mode of triggering final oocyte maturation. Design: Prospective randomized trial. Setting: Three IVF units. Patient(s): Ninety-six patients undergoing IVF-intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Intervention(s): Ovulation triggered with either urinary hCG or GnRH agonist (GnRH-a). Controls: 15 FF samples from small antral follicles (3-9 mm) and 12 FF samples from natural cycle. Main Outcome Measure(s): Follicular fluid concentration of AR, P(4), E(2), vascular endothelial growth factor, and inhibin B. Result(s): Significantly lower levels of AR were found in FF from the GnRH-a group versus the hCG group, 51 +/- 3.5 versus 71 +/- 6.0 ng/mL. In FF from natural cycles, levels of AR were significantly higher than those of GnRHa triggering but significantly lower than those of urinary hCG triggering. In small antral follicles only 5 out of 15 follicles contained measurable amounts of AR. When urinary hCG and GnRH-a triggering were compared, FF P4 was significantly higher after urinary hCG triggering, whereas no difference was seen regarding E2, vascular endothelial growth factor, and inhibin B. A total of 14% more metaphase II oocytes and 11% more transferable embryos were obtained after GnRH-a triggering. Conclusion(s): This study suggests that oocyte competence is linked to granulosa cell AR secretion. (Fertil Steril (R) 2011; 95:2034-8. (C) 2011 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据