4.5 Review

New approaches to the design and discovery of therapies to prevent erectile dysfunction

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DISCOVERY
卷 9, 期 12, 页码 1447-1469

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/17460441.2014.949234

关键词

arginase; cavernosal smooth muscle relaxation; erectile dysfunction; nitric oxide; penile erection

资金

  1. Scientist Development Grant from the American Heart Association (National Affiliate) [13SDG17410007]
  2. Sexual Medicine Society of North America

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Nitric oxide (NO) is critically involved in erectile function. Since NO synthase (NOS) and arginase compete for the same substrate L-arginine, limiting arginase activity may provide more NO and thus be a beneficial therapeutic approach to erectile dysfunction (ED). In the corpora cavernosa, excessive arginase activity/expression has been implicated through studies of preclinical and clinical models of ED. Further, the inhibition of arginase has shown to increase vascular system relaxation and enhance blood flow in penile circulation. Further studies, therefore, looking at therapies targeting arginase could prove to be clinically useful. Areas covered: The authors review gene- and cell-based therapies, the involvement of RhoA/Rho-kinase (ROCK), MAPK and arginase in ED. Expert opinion: Extensive literature supports the view that upregulated arginase activity in cavernosal tissue can reduce NOS function and NO production. Excessive arginase activity has been shown to contribute to the progression of aging-, hypertension- and diabetes-induced vascular dysfunction as well as ED. Earlier studies have shown that RhoA/ROCK and subsequent activation of p38 MAPK mediate elevation of arginase expression/activity in diabetic and hypertensive mice. Reducing corporal arginase activity by gene-based or pharmacological therapy and/or inhibition of upstream regulators of arginase expression may provide novel therapeutic approaches in the management of ED.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据