4.7 Article

Tetrandrine induces apoptosis Via caspase-8,-9, and-3 and poly (ADP ribose) polymerase dependent pathways and autophagy through beclin-1/LC3-I, II signaling pathways in human oral cancer HSC-3 cells

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 31, 期 4, 页码 395-406

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/tox.22053

关键词

oral cancer; HSC-3 cell line; tetrandrine; apoptosis; autophagy

资金

  1. National Science Council, Republic of China (Taiwan) [NSC101-2320-B039-028-MY2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tetrandrine is a bisbenzylisoquinoline alkaloid that was found in the Radix Stephania tetrandra S Moore. It had been reported to induce cytotoxic effects on many human cancer cells. In this study, we investigated the cytotoxic effects of tetrandrine on human oral cancer HSC-3 cells in vitro. Treatments of HSC-3 cells with tetrandrine significantly decreased the percentage of viable cells through the induction of autophagy and apoptosis and these effects are in concentration-dependent manner. To define the mechanism underlying the cytotoxic effects of tetrandrine, we investigated the critical molecular events known to regulate the apoptotic and autophagic machinery. Tetrandrine induced chromatin condensation, internucleosomal DNA fragmentation, activation of caspases-3, -8, and -9, and cleavage of poly (ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP) that were associated with apoptosis, and it also enhanced the expression of LC3-I and -II that were associated with the induction of autophagy in human squamous carcinoma cell line (HSC-3) cells. Tetrandrine induced autophagy in HSC-3 cells was significantly attenuated by bafilomycin A1 (inhibitor of autophagy) pre-treatment that confirmed tetrandrine induced cell death may be associated with the autophagy. In conclusion, we suggest that tetrandrine induced cell death may be through the induction of apoptosis as well as autophagy in human oral cancer HSC-3 cells via PARP, caspases/Becline I/LC3-I/II signaling pathways. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Environ Toxicol 31: 395-406, 2016.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据