4.2 Article

Characterization of the antiyeast compound and probiotic properties of a starter Lactobacillus plantarum DW3 for possible use in fermented plant beverages

期刊

出版社

UNIV CATOLICA DE VALPARAISO
DOI: 10.2225/vol13-issue5-fulltext-1

关键词

fermented plant beverage; Lactobacillus plantarum; phenyllactic acid; probiotics; Rhodotorula mucilaginosa; weight control

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Thailand [CO-B-22-2C-10-483, CO-B-22-2C-18-4801]
  2. Graduate School, Prince of Songkla University
  3. UNESCO / MIRCEN network

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lactobacillus plantarum DW3 produced antifungal compounds that inhibited the growth of Rhodotorula mucilaginosa DKA, contaminating yeast in fermented plant beverages (FPBs) and various potential human pathogens. Phenyllactic acid (PLA) identified by gas chromatography- mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was produced at 31 mg/L PLA in MRS medium and 5 mg/ml inhibited growth of the target yeast in vitro by 90%. Other inhibitors were also present but not specifically identified. Results of in vitro tests showed that DW3 also had probiotic properties as it survived various human biological barriers resistance to pH 3, bile salts, growth without vitamin B-12 and the presence and absence of oxygen. Its inhibitory effect against foodborne pathogenic bacteria and spoilage organisms was higher than that found for a commercial strain Lactobacillus casei R. An acute oral toxicity test on ICR mice at a high single dose of either 10(9) and 10(12) cells per mouse for 14 days showed that DW3 had no adverse effect on the general health status and there was no evidence of bacteremia. Mice fed DW3 had a reduced weight gain compared to the control. No significant difference (p > 0.05) was found for the spleen weight index (SWI) among the treatment and control groups whereas there was a significant difference (p < 0.05) for the liver weight ratio (LWR) in a group fed with 10(12) cells per mouse when compared with the control group.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据