4.6 Article

Application of single walled carbon nanotubes as counter electrode for dye sensitized solar cells

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 85, 期 -, 页码 600-604

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.07.110

关键词

Single walled carbon nanotubes; PVP wrapping agent; SCNTs-carbon composite; Counter electrode; Dye sensitized solar cells

资金

  1. Human Resources Development program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) [20104010100660]
  2. Korea government Ministry of Knowledge Economy
  3. National Research Foundation (NRF), Korea [2011-0029527]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0029527] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An effective counter electrode (CE) was prepared with single-walled carbon nanotubes (SCNTs) for the dye sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) by simple casting technique using polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) as a wrapping agent. The uniform and smooth SCNTs thin film without breaking of tubes were obtained on the fluorine doped tin oxide (FTO) glass substrate by the wrapping of PVP. The SCNTs and carbon residue composite were formed after the calcinations of SCNTs-PVP on FTO glass, which decreased the resistance of the electrode and promoted the higher electrochemical reaction for charge transfer reactions. DSSCs fabricated with SCNTs-PVP CE presented reasonably high conversion efficiency of 4.5% with high open circuit voltage (V-OC) of 0.718V, short circuit current (J(SC)) of 12.14 mA/cm(2) and fill factor (FF) of 51.7%, while the bare SCNTs CE showed the conversion efficiency 2.34% with V-OC 0.680 V,J(SC) 13.7 mA/cm(2) and FF 26%. The improved photovoltaic performance of DSSC attributed to the high electro-catalytic activity for the reduction of I-3(-) ion at SCNTs-PVP CE, resulting from the large R-CE and low R-CT of DSSC. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据