友情提示:以下期刊信息可能会有更新,仅供参考,请在投稿前自行登录期刊官网仔细核实。
期刊名
ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
ELECTROCHIM ACTA
ISSN / eISSN
0013-4686
目标和范围
Electrochimica Acta is an international journal. It is intended for the publication of both original work and reviews in the field of electrochemistry. Electrochemistry should be interpreted to mean any of the research fields covered by the Divisions of the International Society of Electrochemistry listed below, as well as emerging scientific domains covered by ISE New Topics Committee.
研究方向
电化学
CiteScore
12.80
查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 | 分区 | 排名 |
---|---|---|
Chemical Engineering - General Chemical Engineering | Q1 | #19/272 |
Chemical Engineering - Electrochemistry | Q1 | #7/54 |
Web of Science 核心合集
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2023) | 分区 |
---|---|
ELECTROCHEMISTRY - SCIE | Q2 |
H-index
211
出版国家或地区
ENGLAND
出版商
Elsevier Ltd
出版周期
Biweekly
出版年份
1959
年文章数
1646
Open Access
NO
通讯方式
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
认证评论
12.9 - with editor
12.15 - under review
There were initially three reviewers, probably two at first, the first one accepted it directly, the second one rejected it due to differences in opinions, resulting in arbitration, the third reviewer didn't mention major or minor revisions, but provided 10 questions.
1.17 - revise, a total of 24 questions, including the opinions of the rejecting reviewer.
Fortunately, there were no additional experimental requirements, but the rejecting reviewer did have a deep knowledge in electrochemistry and raised many challenging questions that were difficult to answer. With the holiday approaching, I worked hard to respond.
1.26 - responded to reviewer's comments, under review
2.8 - received comments back, the rejecting reviewer's questions changed from rejection to 4, but they were still challenging. It took 3 days to respond.
2.11 - submitted
2.12 - accepted!
I spent 5 minutes writing this paragraph to tell everyone not to rush when submitting manuscripts. Often, the more anxious you are, the less likely you are to succeed. I will be facing my doctoral graduation next year, and I'm actually quite anxious inside, but I must approach it with a calm mindset. Keep going and strive, my fellow researchers!
Returned for revision on December 7th. All three reviewers suggested major revisions. The first submission had incomplete data and poorly drawn figures, but perhaps the highlights of the article were good enough that the reviewers did not reject it. The editor may have felt that there was not enough time and rejected it, but the rejection letter emphasized the need to resubmit with revisions and indicated the number of the first draft.
Resubmitted on January 18th.
Accepted on March 20th, after showing it to the original reviewers who all stated that it was fine and greatly improved. No further modifications were made.
It is evident that the Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry focuses more on the highlights of the article rather than the aesthetics of the figures, unlike some other journals. Articles with innovative and eye-catching points should be submitted here. There is no need to follow the trend of creating flashy and extravagant figures, constantly thinking about the colors and aspect ratios of the figures rather than focusing on the data itself. This is simply a misguided and unproductive practice.
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchAdd your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload Now