4.6 Article

Cascade signal amplification for ultra-sensitive impedimetric detection of DNA hybridization using a hairpin DNA as probe

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 78, 期 -, 页码 377-383

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.06.007

关键词

DNA sensor; Impedimetric; Sandwich; Hairpin DNA; DNA-AuNPs

资金

  1. The National Nature Science Foundation of China [21175089, 20805029]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT 1070]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An ultra-sensitive impedimetric DNA sensor based on cascade signal amplification in sandwich manner was developed. A hairpin DNA was immobilized on a gold electrode and was acted as a probe DNA to improve the selectivity of the device. Without the target DNA, the hairpin DNA probe was in a closed state. However, in the presence of a target DNA, the hybridization between the loop moiety and the target broke the stem duplex. Consequently, the stem moiety at the 3'-end of the probes was moved away from the electrode surface and available for hybridization with the reporter DNA-Au nanoparticles conjugates (reporter DNA-AuNPs). The thiolated reporter DNA was complementary to the stem moiety at the 3'-end of the probe. After the probe DNA/target DNA/reporter DNA-AuNPs sandwich complex was formed on the electrode surface, the AuNPs were enlarged by immersing the electrode in a growth solution containing a negatively charged surfactant. Cascaded signal amplification was achieved because the electrode surface became more negatively charged after each assembly step. The electron-transfer resistance (Ret) of the DNA sensor increased with the increase in target DNA concentration through a wide linear range from 0.1 fM to 300 fM. Under optimized conditions, the DNA sensor could detect as low as 30 aM of the fully matched target DNA. The sensor also showed excellent differentiation ability for single-base mismatch. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据