4.6 Article

Silver nanowire-graphene hybrid nanocomposites as label for sensitive electrochemical immunoassay of alpha-fetoprotein

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 56, 期 24, 页码 8168-8175

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.05.128

关键词

Electrochemical immunosensor; Silver nanowire; Graphene nanosheet; Biomarker; Alpha-fetoprotein

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21075019, 20735002]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20103514120003]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB732403]
  4. Program for Returned High-Level Overseas Chinese Scholars of Fujian Province [XRC-0929]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A facile and sensitive mediator-free electrochemical immunoassay was developed for determination of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in human serum with a sandwich-type mode by using silver nanowire-graphene hybrid nanocomposites (AgNW-GPs) as label. One-pot hydrothermal method was used for the synthesis of the AgNW-GPs with the aid of trisodium citrate. The as-prepared AgNW-GP was not only utilized for the label of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-AFP (HRP-anti-AFP) with highly loading capacity, but also displayed good electrochemical behaviors. Compared with the conventional HRP-anti-AFP-based electrochemical immunoassay, the sensitivity of the proposed immunoassay by using the synthesized nanolabels was greatly improved. Under optimal conditions, the electrochemical immunosensor exhibited a wide linear range of 0.05-400 ng/mL with a low detection limit (LOD) of 5 pg/mL AFP (at 3s(B)). Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were below 10% and 8.5%, respectively. The selectivity and stability of the immunosensor were acceptable. In addition, the methodology was also validated by assaying 16 positive serum samples and 7 negative serum samples, receiving a good correlation with the results obtained from the referenced electrochemiluminescence method. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据