4.7 Article

Spatial determinants of infection risk in a multi-species avian malaria system

期刊

ECOGRAPHY
卷 36, 期 5, 页码 587-598

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07801.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. NERC [NER/A/S/2002/00877, NE/F005725/1]
  2. NERC [NE/F005725/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/F005725/1, NER/A/S/2002/00877] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spatially-variable processes can be an important element of hostparasite interactions, but their longer term demographic and evolutionary effects depend on the magnitude of variation in space, the scale at which variation occurs and the degree to which such processes are temporally stable. Here, we use multiple years of data from a study of two closely related tit species (Paridae), infected with two congeneric species of avian malaria (Plasmodium), to evaluate the roles of extrinsic and intrinsic factors in driving spatial heterogeneity in infection risk, and to address questions of scale and temporal stability in these vector-driven hostparasite interactions. We show that the two malaria parasite species exhibit markedly different spatial epidemiology: P. relictum infections are effectively randomly distributed in space, with no temporal consistency, whereas P. circumflexum infections exhibit pronounced spatial structuring that is stable over the six years of this study and similar in both host species. We show that both conspecific and heterospecific host density contribute to elevated infection risk, but that the main determinants of elevated risk of P. circumflexum infection risk are habitat features probably associated with vector distribution and abundance. We discuss the implications of these findings, both for our understanding of the epidemiology of malaria in the wild, but also in terms of the longer-term evolutionary and demographic consequences that spatially variable parasite-mediated selection may have on host populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据