4.0 Review

New Agents for Acute Treatment of Migraine: CGRP Receptor Antagonists, iNOS Inhibitors

期刊

CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN NEUROLOGY
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 50-59

出版社

CURRENT MEDICINE GROUP
DOI: 10.1007/s11940-011-0155-4

关键词

Migraine; Treatment; Drug therapy; Pathophysiology; CGRP receptor antagonists; Calcitonin gene-related peptide; Gepants; Olcegepant; BI 44370 TA; Telcagepant; Prophylaxis; iNOS inhibitors; GW274150

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [HO4369/1-1]
  2. Allergan
  3. Colucid
  4. MAP
  5. MSD
  6. Neuralieve
  7. Neuraxon
  8. ATI
  9. Boston Scientific
  10. Coherex
  11. Eli Lilly
  12. Medtronic
  13. Linde Gases
  14. BMS
  15. Pfizer
  16. Air Products

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The treatment of migraine was advanced dramatically with the introduction of triptans in the early 1990s. Despite the substantial improvement in the quality of life that triptans have brought to many migraineurs, a substantial cohort of patients remain highly disabled by attacks and need new therapeutic approaches, which ideally should be quick-acting, have no vasoconstrictor activity, and have a longer duration of action and be better tolerated than current therapies. The calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists (gepants)-olcegepant (BIBN 4096 BS), telcagepant (MK-0974), MK3207, and BI 44370 TA-are effective in treating acute migraine. They have no vasoconstrictive properties, fewer adverse effects, and may act longer than triptans. Their development has been complicated by liver toxicity issues when used as preventives. Results from studies with BI 44370 TA do not support broad concern about a class effect, and further studies are ongoing in this respect. Many experimental studies and clinical trials suggest that nitric oxide may have a role in the pathophysiology of migraine. Therefore, the inhibition of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) for the acute or prophylactic treatment of migraine offered a feasible approach; as inducible NOS (iNOS) is involved in several pain states, such as inflammatory pain, it appeared to be an attractive target. However, despite high selectivity and potency, the iNOS inhibitor GW274150 was not effective for acute treatment or prophylaxis of migraine, suggesting that iNOS is very unlikely to be a promising target.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据