4.7 Article

A genetic algorithm embedded with a concise chromosome representation for distributed and flexible job-shop scheduling problems

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 19-34

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-015-1083-z

关键词

Genetic algorithm; Distributed flexible job-shop; Chromosome representation; Chromosome space; Solution space; Shadow chromosomes

资金

  1. National Science Council (Taiwan) [NSC-100-2221-E-009-059-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a genetic algorithm for solving distributed and flexible job-shop scheduling (DFJS) problems. A DFJS problem involves three scheduling decisions: (1) job-to-cell assignment, (2) operation-sequencing, and (3) operation-to-machine assignment. Therefore, solving a DFJS problem is essentially a 3-dimensional solution space search problem; each dimension represents a type of decision. The algorithm is developed by proposing a new and concise chromosome representation , which models a 3-dimensional scheduling solution by a 1-dimensional scheme (i.e., a sequence of all jobs to be scheduled). That is, the chromosome space is 1-dimensional (1D) and the solution space is 3-dimensional (3D). In , we develop a 1D-to-3D decoding method to convert a 1D chromosome into a 3D solution. In addition, given a 3D solution, we use a refinement method to improve the scheduling performance and subsequently use a 3D-to-1D encoding method to convert the refined 3D solution into a 1D chromosome. The 1D-to-3D decoding method is designed to obtain a good 3D solution which tends to be load-balanced. In contrast, the refinement and 3D-to-1D encoding methods of a 3D solution provides a novel way (rather than by genetic operators) to generate new chromosomes, which are herein called shadow chromosomes. Numerical experiments indicate that outperforms the IGA developed by De Giovanni and Pezzella (Eur J Oper Res 200:395-408, 2010), which is the up-to-date best-performing genetic algorithm in solving DFJS problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据