4.6 Article

Metal-Organic Cyclohelicates as Optical Receptors for Glutathione: Syntheses, Structures, and Host-Guest Behaviors

期刊

CHEMISTRY-AN ASIAN JOURNAL
卷 6, 期 5, 页码 1225-1233

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/asia.201000733

关键词

glutathione; host-guest systems; metal-organic frameworks; sensors; supramolecular chemistry

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20923006, 20801008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two trinuclear zinc- based cyclohelicates, Zn-PDB (PDB=[5-(di-benzylamino)-N1',N3'-bis(pyridin-2-yl-methylene)isophthalohydrazide]) and Zn-PMB (PMB=[5-(bodipy-oxy)-N1',N3'- bis(pyridin-2-ylmethylene)isophthalohydrazide]) containing dibenzylamino and BODIPY groups, respectively, were generated by incorporating two amide-containing tridentate chelators into meta-positions of a substituted phenyl ring. Single-crystal structure analysis and related spectroscopic characterizations demonstrated the formation of macrocyclic helicals both in the solid state and in solution. The host-guest behavior of the cyclohelical hosts towards gamma-glutamyl-cysteinyl-glycine (GSH) and its component amino acids was investigated by spectroscopic titrations. UV/Vis absorption titration and NMR titrations of Zn-PDB and Zn-PMB upon addition of the above-mentioned guests suggested that the Glu residue of GSH was positioned within the cavity. The COO- groups interacted with metal ions through static interactions. The Cys moiety of GSH interacted with the amide groups sited in host molecules through hydrogen-bonding interactions to produce measurable spectral changes. Fluorescent titrations of Zn-PMB upon the addition of GSH and ESI-MS investigations of the titration solutions confirmed the host-guest interaction modes and revealed the possible 1:1 complexation stoichiometry. These results showed that the recognition of a substrate within the cavity of functionalized metal-organic cage-like receptors could be a useful method to produce supramolecular sensors for biomolecules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据