4.4 Article

First-in-human, phase I dose-escalation study of single and multiple doses of a first-in-class enhancer of fluoropyrimidines, a dUTPase inhibitor (TAS-114) in healthy male volunteers

期刊

CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY
卷 73, 期 3, 页码 577-583

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00280-014-2383-2

关键词

First-in-human study; dUTPase; 5-Fluorouracil; PK; Safety; DPD; CYP3A4

资金

  1. Taiho Pharmaceutical, Co., Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TAS-114 is a first-in-class oral deoxyuridine triphosphatase (dUTPase) inhibitor, which acts as a modulator of the pyrimidine nucleotide metabolic pathway. This was a first-in-human, phase 1 study that investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of single-agent TAS-114 when it was given at single and multiple doses. For the single-dose cohort (n = 25), healthy male volunteers received a single dose of TAS-114 at 6, 18, 60, 150, and 300 mg. The magnitude of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) inhibition and the food effect on TAS-114 PK were also investigated. For the multiple-dose cohort (n = 10), subjects received TAS-114 for 14 days consecutively. In the dose-escalating single-dose cohort, the disposition of TAS-114 followed linear kinetics. The elimination half-life was approximately 2 h. The urine excretion rate and food effect were minimal. A significant increase in uracil C-max was observed at administered doses of 150 mg or higher of TAS-114, suggesting that significant inhibition of DPD occurred at these doses. No apparent CYP3A4 auto-induction was observed in the multiple-dose cohort. No significant safety concerns at these dose levels were noted after single and multiple dosing. TAS-114 has shown both a favorable safety and pharmacokinetic profile after single and repeated doses. TAS-114 was considered to possess a moderate DPD inhibitory effect. These findings will facilitate clinical studies of the combination chemotherapies in cancer patients and may reduce the safety risk in the frail cancer patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据