Network meta-analysis of the outcome ‘participant complete clearance’ in nonimmunosuppressed participants of eight interventions for actinic keratosis: a follow-up on a Cochrane review
出版年份 2013 全文链接
标题
Network meta-analysis of the outcome ‘participant complete clearance’ in nonimmunosuppressed participants of eight interventions for actinic keratosis: a follow-up on a Cochrane review
作者
关键词
-
出版物
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 169, Issue 2, Pages 250-259
出版商
Wiley
发表日期
2013-03-29
DOI
10.1111/bjd.12343
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- A systematic review of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of pre-cancerous skin conditions, Barrett’s oesophagus and cancers of the biliary tract, brain, head and neck, lung, oesophagus and skin
- (2014) D Fayter et al. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
- Photodynamic Therapy of Non-melanoma Skin Cancer with Methyl Aminolaevulinate is Associated with Less Pain than with Aminolaevulinic Acid
- (2012) M Gaál et al. ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA
- A randomized pilot comparative study of topical methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy versus imiquimod 5% versus sequential application of both therapies in immunocompetent patients with actinic keratosis: Clinical and histologic outcomes
- (2012) Carlos Serra-Guillén et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY
- Ingenol Mebutate Gel for Actinic Keratosis
- (2012) Mark Lebwohl et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Photodynamic therapy with BF-200 ALA for the treatment of actinic keratosis: results of a multicentre, randomized, observer-blind phase III study in comparison with a registered methyl-5-aminolaevulinate cream and placebo
- (2011) T. Dirschka et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
- Treatment with 5-Aminolaevulinic Acid Methylester Is Less Painful than Treatment with 5-Aminolaevulinic Acid Nanoemulsion in Topical Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratosis
- (2011) Patrick Gholam et al. DERMATOLOGY
- Photodynamic therapy with BF-200 ALA for the treatment of actinic keratosis: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study
- (2010) R.-M. Szeimies et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
- Cost Effectiveness of Imiquimod 5% Cream Compared with Methyl Aminolevulinate-Based Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Non-Hyperkeratotic, Non-Hypertrophic Actinic (Solar) Keratoses
- (2010) Edward C.F. Wilson PHARMACOECONOMICS
- Effect of dosing frequency on the safety and efficacy of imiquimod 5% cream for treatment of actinic keratosis on the forearms and hands: a phase II, randomized placebo-controlled trial
- (2009) K. Gebauer et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
- Optimization of photodynamic therapy with a novel self-adhesive 5-aminolaevulinic acid patch: results of two randomized controlled phase III studies
- (2009) A. Hauschild et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
- Topical Methyl Aminolevulinate Photodynamic Therapy Using Red Light-Emitting Diode Light for Multiple Actinic Keratoses
- (2009) Rolf-Markus Szeimies et al. DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY
- An economic evaluation of topical treatments for actinic keratosis
- (2009) Dominic Muston et al. JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT
- Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, vehicle-controlled study of ingenol mebutate gel 0.025% and 0.05% for actinic keratosis
- (2009) Lawrence Anderson et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY
- Topical photodynamic therapy with porphyrin precursors—assessment of treatment-associated pain in a retrospective study
- (2009) Julia Maria Steinbauer et al. PHOTOCHEMICAL & PHOTOBIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
- Topical methyl-aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy using red light-emitting diode light for treatment of multiple actinic keratoses: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
- (2008) David Pariser et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started