4.6 Article

Neighborhood and weight-related health behaviors in the Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes) Study

期刊

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-312

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Health and Human Services through the National Institutes of Health [DK57136, DK57149, DK56990, DK57177, DK57171, DK57151, DK57182, DK57131, DK57002, DK57078, DK57154, DK57178, DK57219, DK57008, DK57135, DK56992]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  4. National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities
  5. Office of Research on Women's Health
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  7. National Institute of Nursing Research
  8. Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions Bayview General Clinical Research Center [M01-RR-02719]
  9. Massachusetts General Hospital Mallinckrodt General Clinical Research Center [M01-RR-01066]
  10. University of Colorado Health Sciences Center General Clinical Research Center [M01 RR00051]
  11. Clinical Nutrition Research Unit [P30 DK48520]
  12. University of Tennessee at Memphis General Clinical Research Center [M01RR00211-40]
  13. University of Pittsburgh General Clinical Research Center [M01 RR000056 44]
  14. NIH [DK 046204]
  15. University of Washington/VA Puget Sound Health Care System Medical Research Service, Department of Veterans Affairs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Previous studies have shown that neighborhood factors are associated with obesity, but few studies have evaluated the association with weight control behaviors. This study aims to conduct a multi-level analysis to examine the relationship between neighborhood SES and weight-related health behaviors. Methods: In this ancillary study to Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes) a trial of long-term weight loss among individuals with type 2 diabetes, individual-level data on 1219 participants from 4 clinic sites at baseline were linked to neighborhood-level data at the tract level from the 2000 US Census and other databases. Neighborhood variables included SES (% living below the federal poverty level) and the availability of food stores, convenience stores, and restaurants. Dependent variables included BMI, eating patterns, weight control behaviors and resource use related to food and physical activity. Multi-level models were used to account for individual-level SES and potential confounders. Results: The availability of restaurants was related to several eating and weight control behaviors. Compared to their counterparts in neighborhoods with fewer restaurants, participants in neighborhoods with more restaurants were more likely to eat breakfast (prevalence Ratio [PR] 1.29 95% CI: 1.01-1.62) and lunch (PR = 1.19, 1.04-1.36) at non-fast food restaurants. They were less likely to be attempting weight loss (OR = 0.93, 0.89-0.97) but more likely to engage in weight control behaviors for food and physical activity, respectively, than those who lived in neighborhoods with fewer restaurants. In contrast, neighborhood SES had little association with weight control behaviors. Conclusion: In this selected group of weight loss trial participants, restaurant availability was associated with some weight control practices, but neighborhood SES was not. Future studies should give attention to other populations and to evaluating various aspects of the physical and social environment with weight control practices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据