期刊名
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH

ISSN / eISSN
1471-2458 / 1471-2458
目标和范围
BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
研究方向

公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生

CiteScore
6.10 查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 分区 排名
Medicine - Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health Q1 #91/577
Web of Science 核心合集
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2023) 分区
PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH - SCIE Q2
H-index
117
出版国家或地区
ENGLAND
出版商
BioMed Central
出版周期
Irregular
出版年份
2001
年文章数
2396
Open Access
YES
通讯方式
BIOMED CENTRAL LTD, 236 GRAYS INN RD, FLOOR 6, LONDON, ENGLAND, WC1X 8HL
认证评论
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。
I also submitted it in August 2020, and it was revised in February 2021. Because it was during the Chinese New Year period, I didn't want to be too tired, so I delayed it for more than two months and revised it by the end of April. Then it was revised again in mid-May. I still didn't want to be too tired, so I delayed it for another month, and then revised it in June. An expert gave me some good advice, which I didn't understand at first, but later I made the modifications according to his requirements. It was accepted in mid-July, and I paid the publication fee. I received the proof in early August and it was published online 4 days later. I think the journal is super nice. Every time I exceeded the deadline, I would email to explain the reasons, and the editor would always reply to me. It's really good.
2021-08-08
After three months of submission, there was no assigned editor. During this period, two reminder letters were sent. Finally, in the third month, an editor was assigned. Soon after the assignment, an external reviewer was invited. The review process by the expert was quite fast, and the review was received in about a month. One of the external reviewers provided a very negative evaluation, while the other one raised some professional questions. In the end, after more than four months, the manuscript was rejected. The early-stage editorial process was too slow.
2022-12-06

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript

Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.

Search