4.6 Article

Requirement of HIV-1 Vif C-terminus for Vif-CBF-β interaction and assembly of CUL5-containing E3 ligase

期刊

BMC MICROBIOLOGY
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s12866-014-0290-7

关键词

HIV-1 Vif; CBF-beta; C-terminus; APOBEC3

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31270202]
  2. Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology [2012CB911100, 2013ZX10001-005]
  3. Chinese Ministry of Education [IRT1016]
  4. Key Laboratory of Molecular Virology, Jilin Province [20102209]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Vif hijacks an E3 ligase to suppress natural APOBEC3 restriction factors, and core binding factor beta (CBF-beta) is required for this process. Although an extensive region of Vif spanning most of its N-terminus is known to be critical for binding with CBF-beta, involvement of the Vif C-terminus in the interaction with CBF-beta has not been fully investigated. Results: Here, through immunoprecipitation analysis of Vif C-terminal truncated mutants of various lengths, we identified that CBF-beta binding requires not only certain amino acids (G126A, E134A, Y135A and G138A) in the HCCH region but also the HCCH motif itself, which also affects the Vif-mediated suppression of APOBEC3G/APOBEC3F (A3G/A3F). These mutants still maintained interactions with substrate A3G or A3F as well as other cellular factors ElonginB/C (ELOB/C), indicating that their structures were not functionally affected. Moreover, by determining that the BC box also is necessary for CBF-beta interaction in vivo, we speculate that binding to ELOB/C induces conformational changes in Vif, facilitating its interaction with CBF-beta and consequent interaction with CUL5. Conclusions: These results provide important information on the assembly of the Vif-CUL5-E3 ubiquitin ligase. Identification of the new binding interface with CBF-beta at the C-terminus of HIV-1 Vif also provides novel targets for the development of HIV-1 inhibitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据