4.6 Article

PeptX: Using Genetic Algorithms to optimize peptides for MHC binding

期刊

BMC BIOINFORMATICS
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-241

关键词

-

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P22258-B12]
  2. Austrian Ministry of Education, Science and Culture [GZ 4003/2-VI/4c/2004]
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P22258] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 22258] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The binding between the major histocompatibility complex and the presented peptide is an indispensable prerequisite for the adaptive immune response. There is a plethora of different in silico techniques for the prediction of the peptide binding affinity to major histocompatibility complexes. Most studies screen a set of peptides for promising candidates to predict possible T cell epitopes. In this study we ask the question vice versa: Which peptides do have highest binding affinities to a given major histocompatibility complex according to certain in silico scoring functions? Results: Since a full screening of all possible peptides is not feasible in reasonable runtime, we introduce a heuristic approach. We developed a framework for Genetic Algorithms to optimize peptides for the binding to major histocompatibility complexes. In an extensive benchmark we tested various operator combinations. We found that (1) selection operators have a strong influence on the convergence of the population while recombination operators have minor influence and (2) that five different binding prediction methods lead to five different sets of optimal peptides for the same major histocompatibility complex. The consensus peptides were experimentally verified as high affinity binders. Conclusion: We provide a generalized framework to calculate sets of high affinity binders based on different previously published scoring functions in reasonable runtime. Furthermore we give insight into the different behaviours of operators and scoring functions of the Genetic Algorithm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据