4.7 Article

The degree of BCR and NFAT activation predicts clinical outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

期刊

BLOOD
卷 120, 期 2, 页码 356-365

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-12-397158

关键词

-

资金

  1. Inserm
  2. University Paris Nord
  3. Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer
  4. Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer
  5. Fondation de France
  6. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale.
  7. Servier Paris Bio fellowship
  8. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale and Societe Franc, aise d'Hematologie fellowships

向作者/读者索取更多资源

B-cell antigen receptor (BCR)-mediated signaling plays a critical role in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) pathogenesis and gives an in vitro survival advantage to B cells isolated from patients with unfavorable prognostic factors. In this study, we undertook to elucidate the signaling intermediates responsible for this biologic alteration. In responding cells only, in vitro BCR engagement triggers global phosphorylation of Syk, activation of phospholipase C gamma 2, and intracellular calcium mobilization, reflecting competency of BCR signaling. The calcium-calcineurin-dependent transcription factor NFAT2 is up-regulated and to some extent constitutively activated in all CLL B cells. In contrast, its DNA-binding capacity is enhanced on IgM stimulation in responding cells only. NFAT inhibition using the VIVIT peptide prevents induction of CD23 target gene and IgM-induced survival, converting responding cells to unresponsive status. At the opposite, ionomycin-induced NFAT activity allows survival of nonresponding cells. These results demonstrate that the functional heterogeneity relies on variability of protein levels establishing BCR-dependent thresholds and NFAT-dependent activation. Finally, status of the BCR-NFAT pathway for each patient reveals its relevance for CLL clinical outcome and points out to BCR-NFAT intermediates as promising functional therapeutic targets. (Blood. 2012;120(2):356-365)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据