4.7 Article

Cross talk between the bone and immune systems: osteoclasts function as antigen-presenting cells and activate CD4+ and CD8+ T cells

期刊

BLOOD
卷 116, 期 2, 页码 210-217

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-11-255026

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
  2. Center for Targeted Therapy of The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
  3. National Cancer Institute [R01 CA96569, R01 CA103978, R01 CA138402]
  4. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society
  5. Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation
  6. Commonwealth Foundation for Cancer Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The bone and immune systems are closely related through cellular and molecular interactions. Because bone-resorbing osteoclasts (OCs) are derived from the monocyte/macrophage lineage, similar to dendritic cells (DCs), we hypothesized that OCs could serve as antigen-presenting cells (APCs) to activate T cells. In this study, OCs were generated from human monocytes with stimulation by receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL) and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF). Results showed that, similar to DCs, OCs express major histocompatibility complex (MHC) classes I and II, and CD80, CD86, and CD40; and uptake soluble antigens. OCs secrete interleukin-10 (IL-10), transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), but not IL-12p70. OCs present allogeneic antigens and activate both CD4(+) and CD8(+) alloreactive T cells in an MHC-restricted fashion. OCs also present soluble protein tetanus toxoid to activate autologous CD4(+) T cells. These findings indicate that OCs can function as APCs and activate both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. Thus, our study provides new insight into the effect of OCs on the immune system and may help develop novel strategies for treating diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and multiple myeloma, which affect both the bone and immune systems. (Blood. 2010; 116(2): 210-217)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据