4.6 Article

Selective Antibody Precipitation Using Polyelectrolytes: A Novel Approach to the Purification of Monoclonal Antibodies

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
卷 102, 期 4, 页码 1141-1151

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.22127

关键词

polyelectrolytes; monoclonal antibody; precipitation; purification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We evaluated the potential for polyelectrolyte induced precipitation of antibodies to replace traditional chromatography purification. We investigated the impact of solution pH, solution ionic strength and polyelectrolyte molecular weight oil the degree of precipitation using Bile anionic polyelectrolytes polyvinylsulfonic acid (PVS), polyacrylic acid (PAA), and polystyrenesulforlic acid (PSS). As we approached the pl of the antibody, charge neutralization of the antibody reduced the antibody-polyelectrolyte interaction, reducing antibody precipitation. At a given pH, increasing solution ionic strength prevented the ionic interaction between the polyelectrolyte and the antibody, reducing antibody precipitation. With increasing pH of precipitation, there was all increase ill impurity clearance. Increasing polyelectrolyte molecular weight allowed the precipitation to be performed under conditions of higher ionic strength. PVS was selected as the preferred polyelectrolyte based oil step yield following resolubilization, purification performance, as well as the nature of the precipitate. We evaluated PVS precipitation as a replacement for the initial capture step, as well as all intermediate polishing step ill the purification of a humanized monoclonal antibody. PVS precipitation separated the antibody from host cell impurities such as host cell proteins (HCP) and DNA, process impurities such as leached protein A, insulin and gentamicin, as well as antibody fragments and aggregates. PVS was subsequently removed from antibody pools to < 1 mu g/mg using anion exchange chromatography. PVS precipitation did not impact the biological activity of the resolubilized antibody.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据