4.8 Article

A functional biphasic biomaterial homing mesenchymal stem cells for in vivo cartilage regeneration

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 35, 期 36, 页码 9608-9619

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.08.020

关键词

Affinity peptide; Cartilage repair; Functional biomaterials; Mesenchymal stem cells homing; Tissue engineering

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [90919022, 81101390]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20110001130001]
  3. Leading Academic Discipline Project of Beijing Education Bureau

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cartilage regeneration after trauma is still a great challenge for clinicians and researchers due to many reasons, such as joint load-bearing, synovial movement and the paucity of endogenous repair cells. To overcome these limitations, we constructed a functional biomaterial using a biphasic scaffold platform and a bone-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs)-specific affinity peptide. The biphasic scaffold platform retains more cells homogeneously within the sol-gel transition of chitosan and provides sufficient solid matrix strength. This biphasic scaffold platform is functionalized with an affinity peptide targeting a cell source of interest, BMSCs. The presence of conjugated peptide gives this system a biological functionality towards BMSC-specific homing both in vitro and in vivo. The functional biomaterial can stimulate stem cell proliferation and chondrogenic differentiation during in vitro culture. Six months after in vivo implantation, compared with routine surgery or control scaffolds, the functional biomaterials induced superior cartilage repair without complications, as indicated by histological observations, magnetic resonance imaging and biomechanical properties. Beyond cartilage repair, this functional biphasic scaffold may provide a biomaterial framework for one-step tissue engineering strategy by homing endogenous cells to stimulate tissue regeneration. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据