4.8 Article

Intracellular pathways and nuclear localization signal peptide-mediated gene transfection by cationic polymeric nanovectors

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 1135-1145

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.023

关键词

Polyethylenimine (PEI) - cyclodextrin (CyD); Cell internalization; Lysosomal trafficking; Nuclear signal peptide

资金

  1. National High Technology Development Program of China (863 Program) [2007AA03Z355, 2009AA02Z416]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30970711, 21074111]
  3. International Science and Technology Corperation [2011DFA30790]
  4. Hong Kong Research Grants Council (RGC) [CityU 112510]
  5. [CityU 9231026]
  6. [CityU 9678028]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polyethylenimine (PEI) - based polymers are promising cationic nanovectors. A good understanding of the mechanism by which cationic polymers/DNA complexes are internalized and delivered to nuclei helps to identify which transport steps may be manipulated in order to improve the transfection efficiency. In this work, cell internalization and trafficking of PEI-CyD (PC) composed of beta-cyclodextrin (beta-CyD) and polyethylenimine (PEI, Mw 600) are studied. The results show that the PC transfected DNA is internalized by binding membrane-associated proteoglycans. The endocytic pathway of the PC particles is caveolae- and clathrin-dependent with both pathways converging to the lysosome. The intracellular fate of the PC provides visual evidence that it can escape from the lysosome. Lysosomal inhibition with chloroquine has no effect on PC mediated transfection implying that blocking the lysosomal traffic does not improve transfection. To improve the nuclear delivery of PC transfected DNA, nuclear localization signal (NLS) peptides are chosen to conjugate and combine with the PC. Compared to PC/pDNA, PC-NLS/pDNA, and PC/pDNA/NLS can effectively improve gene transfection in dividing and non-dividing cells. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据