4.8 Article

Towards personalized medicine with a three-dimensional micro-scale perfusion-based two-chamber tissue model system

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 33, 期 17, 页码 4353-4361

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.054

关键词

Glioblastoma; 3D cell culture; Micro-scale tissue model system; Two-chamber system; Liver CYP metabolism; Metabolism-dependent toxicity

资金

  1. NIH [R21EB008573]
  2. NSF [CMMI-0348767, CMMI-1131710]
  3. University of Eastern Finland (UEF-STEM consortium)
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1131710] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A three-dimensional micro-scale perfusion-based two-chamber (3D-mu PTC) tissue model system was developed to test the cytotoxicity of anticancer drugs in conjunction with liver metabolism. Liver cells with different cytochrome P450 (CYP) subtypes and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) brain cancer cells were cultured in two separate chambers connected in tandem. Both chambers contained a 3D tissue engineering scaffold fabricated with biodegradable poly(lactic acid) (PLA) using a solvent-free approach. We used this model system to test the cytotoxicity of anticancer drugs, including temozolomide (TMZ) and ifosfamide (IFO). With the liver cells, TMZ showed a much lower toxicity to GBM cells under both 20 and 3D cell culture conditions. Comparing 2D, GBM cells cultured in 3D had much high viability under TMZ treatment. IFO was used to test the CYP-related metabolic effects. Cells with different expression levels of CYP3A4 differed dramatically in their ability to activate IFO, which led to strong metabolism-dependent cytotoxicity to GBM cells. These results demonstrate that our 3D-mu PTC system could provide a more physiologically realistic in vitro environment than the current 2D monolayers for testing metabolism-dependent toxicity of anticancer drugs. It could therefore be used as an important platform for better prediction of drug dosing and schedule towards personalized medicine. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据