4.8 Article

Three-dimensional cancer-bone metastasis model using ex-vivo co-cultures of live calvarial bones and cancer cells

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 1065-1078

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.046

关键词

Breast and prostate cancer cells; Bone resorption; Bone formation; Calvarial bone organ cultures; Indomethacin; Cancer-Bone metastasis model; Prostaglandin E2

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [RO1 AG 17969]
  2. Harvard Medical School

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One of the major limitations of studying cancer-bone metastasis has been the lack of an appropriate ex-vivo model which can be used under defined conditions that simulates closely the in vivo live bone microenvironment in response to cancer-bone interactions. We have developed and utilized a three-dimensional (3D) cancer-bone metastasis model using free-floating live mouse calvarial bone organs in the presence of cancer cells in a roller tube system. In such co-cultures under hypoxia and a specifically defined bone remodeling stage, viz., resorption system, cancer cells showed a remarkable affinity and specificity for the endosteal side of the bone where they colonize and proliferate. This was concurrent with differentiation of resident stem/progenitor cells to osteoclasts and bone resorption. In contrast, under bone formation conditions this model revealed different pathophysiology where the breast cancer cells continued to induce osteoclastic bone resorption whereas prostate cancer cells led to osteoblastic bone formation. The current 3D model was used to demonstrate its application to studies involving chemical and biochemical perturbations in the absence and presence of cancer cells and cellular responses. We describe proof-of-principle with examples of the broad versatility and multi-faceted application of this model that adds another dimension to the ongoing studies in the cancer-bone metastasis arena. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据