4.8 Article

Controlling multipotent stromal cell migration by integrating course-graining materials and fine-tuning small molecules via decision tree signal-response modeling

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 32, 期 30, 页码 7524-7531

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.050

关键词

Mesenchymal stem cells; Cell migration; Extracellular matrix; Epidermal growth factor; Computational modeling

资金

  1. NIH Cell Migration Consortium [U54-GM064346]
  2. NIH [R01-GM018336, R01-DE019523]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biomimetic scaffolds have been proposed as a means to facilitate tissue regeneration by multi-potent stromal cells (MSCs). Effective scaffold colonization requires a control of multiple MSC responses including survival, proliferation, differentiation, and migration. As MSC migration is relatively unstudied in this context, we present here a multi-level approach to its understanding and control, integratively tuning cell speed and directional persistence to achieve maximal mean free path (MFP) of migration. This approach employs data-driven computational modeling to ascertain small molecule drug treatments that can enhance MFP on a given materials substratum. Using poly(methyl methacrylate)graft-poly(ethylene oxide) polymer surfaces tethered with epidermal growth factor (tEGF) and systematically adsorbed with fibronectin, vitronectin, or collagen-I to present hTERT-immortalized human MSCs with growth factor and extracellular matrix cues, we measured cell motility properties along with signaling activities of EGFR, ERK, Akt, and FAK on 19 different substrate conditions. Speed was consistent on collagen/tEGF substrates, but low associated directional persistence limited MFP. Decision tree modeling successfully predicted that ERK inhibition should enhance MFP on collagen/tEGF substrates by increasing persistence. Thus, we demonstrated a two-tiered approach to control MSC migration: materials-based coarse-graining complemented by small molecule fine-tuning. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据