4.8 Article

Therapeutic effects of a reducible poly (oligo-D-arginine) carrier with the heme oxygenase-1 gene in the treatment of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 31, 期 34, 页码 9128-9134

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.038

关键词

Gene therapy; Gene expression; Peptide; In vivo test; Animal model

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [20090081874, 200900000000024]
  2. Hanyang University Institute of Aging Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-viral carriers for gene therapy have been developed to minimize carrier cytotoxicity and to enhance transfection efficiency. Previously, we synthesized a 9-arginine-based reducible high molecular weight peptide for gene delivery. For the reducible poly(oligo-D-arginines) (rPOA), 9-arginine oligopeptides are connected by internal disulfide linkages to produce a high molecular weight peptide. In this study, rPOA was evaluated as a carrier of the heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) gene for the treatment of ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) -induced brain stroke. An in vitro transfection assay showed that rPOA had higher transfection efficiency and lower toxicity than polyethylenimine (PEI). For in vivo evaluation, I/R rat models were produced by middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). rPOA/HO-1 expression plasmid (pHO-1) polyplexes were injected into the brain at 1 h before MCAO, and HO-1 expression levels in the brain were then measured by ELISA. The results indicated that rPOA/pHO-1 polyplexes had higher transfection efficiencies than PEI/pHO-1 polyplexes. The rPOA/pHO-1 polyplexes significantly reduced infarct volumes. In addition. tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) was reduced in the rPOA/pHO-1 polyplex injection group, suggesting that HO-1 had an anti-inflammatory effect, while the PEI/pHO-1 polyplex did not show this effect. These results suggest that rPOA is a potential non-viral vector for HO-1 gene therapy to protect brain cells from I/R-related neuronal injury including stroke. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据