4.8 Article

The effect of micronscale anisotropic cross patterns on fibroblast migration

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 31, 期 15, 页码 4286-4295

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.103

关键词

Cell migration; Contact guidance; Haptotaxis; Micropatterning; Laser manufacturing; Two-photon initiated polymerization

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [DMI-0556363]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cell movement on adhesive surfaces is a complicated process based on myriad cell-surface interactions. Although both micron and nanoscale surface topography have been known to be important in understanding cell-materials interactions, typically only simple patterns (e.g., parallel lines or aligned posts) have been used in studying cell morphology, migration, and behavior. This restriction has limited the understanding of the multidirectional aspects of cell-surface response. The present study was performed to investigate cell morphology and motility on micronscale anisotropic cross patterns and parallel line patterns having different aspect ratios (1:2, 1:4, and 1: infinity), grid size (12-, 16-, and 24-mu m distance neighboring longer side ridges), and height of ridges (3- and 10-mu m). The movement characteristics were analyzed quantitatively with respect to cell migration speed, migration angle, persistence time (P) and motility coefficient (mu). A significant effect of the 1:4 grid aspect ratio cross patterns and parallel line patterns on cell alignment and directionality of migration was observed. Cell motility was also dependent on the patterned surface topography: the migration speed was significantly enhanced by the 1:2 and 1:4 cross patterns when the grid size was smaller than the size of individual cells (i.e., similar to 16 mu m). In addition, the migration speed of cells on lower patterns was greater than on higher ridges. Overall, cell morphology and motility was influenced by the aspect ratio of the cross pattern, the grid size, and the height of ridges. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据