4.8 Article

Inhibition of cytokine and surface antigen expression in LPS-stimulated murine macrophages by triethylene glycol dimethacrylate

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 30, 期 9, 页码 1665-1674

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.024

关键词

Dental resin; TEGDMA; Lipopolysaccharide; Cytokine; Surface antigen

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgerneinschaft [Schw 431/11-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dental resin monomers like triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) cause a shift in the cellular redox balance which influences redox-sensitive signaling pathways. The immediate response of the innate immune system to inflammatory challenges is controlled by related pathways. Therefore, the influence of TEGDMA on the expression of the pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines TNF-alpha, IL-6, and IL-10 and surface antigens (CD14, CD40, CD80, CD86, CD54, MHC class I and II) was analyzed in RAW264.7 macrophages. No significant change in cytokine production or surface antigen expression was detected after the macrophages were treated with increasing TEGDMA concentrations for 6, 24, and 48 h. However, co-stimulation with the bacterial endotoxin lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and TEGDMA resulted in a concentration-dependent inhibition of LPS-induced release of TNF-alpha, IL-6, and IL-10 by about 90% as detected by ELISA. Flow-cytometric analyses indicated an LPS-stimulated expression of all surface antigens. The LPS-induced expression of CD14 was inhibited by high TEGDMA concentrations. CD40 and CD80 expressions were down-regulated by TEGDMA in LPS-stimulated cells, and CD86 as well as MHC class I expression was inhibited to a lesser extent. The LPS-stimulated expression of CD54 (ICAM-1) was increased about twofold by increasing TEGDMA concentrations after a 24 and 48 h exposure. Thus, the ability of macrophages to induce an appropriate immune response is inhibited by TEGDMA which reduces cytokine production and expression of surface antigens. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据