4.0 Article

Impact of the CTLA-4/CD28 axis on the processes of joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis

期刊

ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
卷 65, 期 1, 页码 81-87

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/art.37714

关键词

-

资金

  1. DFG [Br1860/6, SFB 650, SFB 854]
  2. Pfizer
  3. Becton Dickinson
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective The importance of the costimulatory molecules CD28 and CTLA-4 in the pathologic mechanism of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been demonstrated by genetic associations and the successful clinical application of CTLA-4Ig for the treatment of RA. This study was undertaken to investigate the role of the CTLA-4/CD28 axis in the local application of CTLA-4Ig in the synovial fluid (SF) of RA patients. Methods Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used to analyze the expression of proinflammatory and antiinflammatory cytokines in ex vivo fluorescence-activated cell sorted CTLA-4+ and CTLA-4- T helper cells from the peripheral blood and SF of RA patients. T helper cells were also analyzed for cytokine expression in vitro after the blockade of CTLA-4 by antiCTLA-4 Fab fragments or of B7 (CD80/CD86) molecules by CTLA-4Ig. Results CTLA-4+ T helper cells were unambiguously present in the SF of all RA patients examined, and they expressed increased amounts of interferon-? (IFN?), interleukin-17 (IL-17), and IL-10 as compared to CTLA-4- T helper cells. The selective blockade of CTLA-4 in T helper cells from the SF in vitro led to increased levels of IFN?, IL-2, and IL-17. The concomitant blockade of CD28 and CTLA-4 in T helper cells from RA SF by CTLA-4Ig in vitro resulted in reduced levels of the proinflammatory cytokines IFN? and IL-2 and increased levels of the antiinflammatory cytokines IL-10 and transforming growth factor beta. Conclusion Our ex vivo and in vitro results demonstrate that the CTLA-4/CD28 axis constitutes a drug target for not only the systemic, but potentially also the local, application of the costimulation blocking agent CTLA-4Ig for the treatment of RA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据