4.7 Article

Mercury speciation analysis in seafood by species-specific isotope dilution: method validation and occurrence data

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 401, 期 9, 页码 2699-2711

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-011-5040-1

关键词

Speciation; Methylmercury; Seafood; GC/ICPMS; Species-specific isotope dilution analysis

资金

  1. National Research Agency (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methylmercury (MeHg) and total mercury (THg) in seafood were determined using species-specific isotope dilution analysis and gas chromatography combined with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Sample preparation methods (extraction and derivation step) were evaluated on certified reference materials using isotopically enriched Hg species. Solid-liquid extraction, derivation by propylation and automated agitation gave excellent accuracy and precision results. Satisfactory figures of merit for the selected method were obtained in terms of limit of quantification (1.2 mu g Hg kg(-1) for MeHg and 1.4 mu g Hg kg(-1) for THg), repeatability (1.3-1.7%), intermediate precision reproducibility (1.5% for MeHg and 2.2% for THg) and trueness (bias error less than 7%). By means of a recent strategy based on accuracy profiles (beta-expectation tolerance intervals), the selected method was successfully validated in the range of approximately 0.15-5.1 mg kg(-1) for MeHg and 0.27-5.2 mg kg(-1) for THg. Probability beta was set to 95% and the acceptability limits to +/- 15%. The method was then applied to 62 seafood samples representative of consumption in the French population. The MeHg concentrations were generally low (1.9-588 mu g kg(-1)), and the percentage of MeHg varied from 28% to 98% in shellfish and from 84% to 97% in fish. For all real samples tested, methylation and demethylation reactions were not significant, except in one oyster sample. The method presented here could be used for monitoring food contamination by MeHg and inorganic Hg in the future to more accurately assess human exposure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据