4.7 Article

Application of viability PCR to discriminate the infectivity of hepatitis A virus in food samples

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.02.012

关键词

Hepatitis A virus; Quantitative PCR; Viability dyes; Propidium monoazide; Ethidium monoazide

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [AGL2009-08603]
  2. Generalitat Valenciana [ACOMP/2010/279, ACOMP/2012/199]
  3. Ramon y Cajal Young Investigator program of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [RYC-2012-09950]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transmitted through the fecal-oral route, the hepatitis A virus (HAV) is acquired primarily through close personal contact and foodborne transmission. HAV detection in food is mainly carried out by quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR). The discrimination of infectious and inactivated viruses remains a key obstacle when using RT-qPCR to quantify enteric viruses in food samples. Initially, viability dyes, propidium monoazide (PMA) and ethidium monoazide (EMA), were evaluated for the detection and quantification of infectious HAV in lettuce wash water. Results showed that PMA combined with 0.5% Triton X-100 (Triton) was the best pretreatment to assess HAV infectivity and completely eliminated the signal of thermally inactivated HAV in lettuce wash water. This procedure was further evaluated in artificially inoculated foods (at concentrations of ca. 6 x 10(4), 6 x 10(3) and 6 x 10(2) TCID50) including lettuce, parsley, spinach, cockles and coquina clams. The PMA-0.5% Triton pretreatment reduced the signal of thermally inactivated HAV between 0.5 and 2 logs, in lettuce and spinach concentrates. Moreover, this pretreatment reduced the signal of inactivated HAV by more than 1.5 logs, in parsley and ten-fold diluted shellfish samples inoculated at the lowest concentration. Overall, this pretreatment (50 mu M PMA-0.5% Triton) significantly reduced the detection of thermally inactivated HAV, depending on the initial virus concentration and the food matrix. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据