4.6 Article

miRNAome expression profiles in the gonads of adult Melopsittacus undulatus

期刊

PEERJ
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4615

关键词

Gonads; Sex-biased; miRNA; Adult; Melopsittacus undulatus

资金

  1. Major Program of Natural Science Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions [KJ2016SD22]
  2. Promotion Plan and Teaching Reform in Scientific Research Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Anhui Province, China [2015zdjy035]
  3. Key Program of Natural Science Foundation of the Anhui Higher Education Institutions [KJ2016A735]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The budgerigar (Melopsittacus unduiatus) is one of the most widely studied parrot species, serving as an excellent animal model for behavior and neuroscience research. Until recently, it was unknown how sexual differences in the behavior, physiology, and development of organisms are regulated by differential gene expression, MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous short non-coding RNA molecules that can post-transcriptionally regulate gene expression and play a critical role in gonadal differentiation as well as early development of animals. However, very little is known about the role gonadal miRNAs play in the early development of birds. Research on the sex-biased expression of miRNAs in avian gonads are limited, and little is known about M. undulatus, In the current study, we sequenced two small non-coding RNA libraries made from the gonads of adult male and female budgerigars using 'lumina paired-end sequencing technology. We obtained 254 known and 141 novel miRNAs, and randomly validated five miRNAs, Of these, three miRNAs were differentially expressed miRNAs and 18 miRNAs involved in sexual differentiation as determined by functional analysis with GO annotation and KEGG pathway analysis. In conclusion, this work is the first report of sex-biased miRNAs expression in the budgerigar, and provides additional sequences to the avian miRNAome database which will foster further functional genornic research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据