4.7 Article

Virtual Genome Walking across the 32 Gb &ITAmbystoma mexicanum&IT genome; assembling gene models and intronic sequence

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-19128-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [204843/Z/16/Z]
  2. Medical Research Council [MR/N020979/1]
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/M012336/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Medical Research Council [MR/L001047/1, G0900147, G0700078, MR/N020979/1, G1100025] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. BBSRC [BB/M012336/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. MRC [G0700078, MR/L001047/1, G0900147, MR/N020979/1, G1100025] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Wellcome Trust [204843/Z/16/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large repeat rich genomes present challenges for assembly using short read technologies. The 32 Gb axolotl genome is estimated to contain similar to 19 Gb of repetitive DNA making an assembly from short reads alone effectively impossible. Indeed, this model species has been sequenced to 20x coverage but the reads could not be conventionally assembled. Using an alternative strategy, we have assembled subsets of these reads into scaffolds describing over 19,000 gene models. We call this method Virtual Genome Walking as it locally assembles whole genome reads based on a reference transcriptome, identifying exons and iteratively extending them into surrounding genomic sequence. These assemblies are then linked and refined to generate gene models including upstream and downstream genomic, and intronic, sequence. Our assemblies are validated by comparison with previously published axolotl bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) sequences. Our analyses of axolotl intron length, intron-exon structure, repeat content and synteny provide novel insights into the genic structure of this model species. This resource will enable new experimental approaches in axolotl, such as ChIP-Seq and CRISPR and aid in future whole genome sequencing efforts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据