4.2 Article

ITS2 metabarcoding analysis complements lichen mycobiome diversity data

期刊

MYCOLOGICAL PROGRESS
卷 17, 期 9, 页码 1049-1066

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11557-018-1415-4

关键词

Ascomycetes; Basidiomycetes; Endophytes; Fungal isolates; Ion torrent; ITS1

类别

资金

  1. University of Graz
  2. project FRA-2014 (Finanziamenti di Ateneo per progetti di Ricerca scientifica) by the University of Trieste
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P24114-B16]
  4. Italian Government Commission with Fondo Trieste
  5. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P24114] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lichen thalli harbor complex fungal communities (mycobiomes) of species with divergent trophic and ecological strategies. The complexity and diversity of lichen mycobiomes are still largely unknown, despite surveys combining culture-based methods and high-throughput sequencing (HTS). The results of such surveys are strongly influenced by the barcode locus chosen, its sensitivity in discriminating taxa, and the depth to which public sequence repositories cover the phylogenetic spectrum of fungi. Here, we use HTS of the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) to assess the taxonomic composition and diversity of a well-characterized, alpine rock lichen community that includes thalli symptomatically infected by lichenicolous fungi as well as asymptomatic thalli. Taxa belonging to the order Chaetothyriales are the major components of the observed lichen mycobiomes. We predict sequences representative of lichenicolous fungi characterized morphologically and assess their asymptomatic presence in lichen thalli. We demonstrated the limitations of metabarcoding in fungi and show how the estimation of species diversity widely differs when ITS1 or ITS2 are used as barcode, and particularly biases the detection of Basidiomycota. The complementary analysis of both ITS1 and ITS2 loci is therefore required to reliably estimate the diversity of lichen mycobiomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据