4.6 Article

Study of the austenitic stainless steel with gradient structured surface fabricated via shot peening

期刊

MATERIALS LETTERS
卷 215, 期 -, 页码 187-190

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.12.021

关键词

Austenitic steels; Plastic deformation; Shot peening; Gradient microstructure; TEM

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MEST) [2011-0030058]
  2. Energy Technology Development Program of Korea Institute - Korea Government's Ministry of trade, Industry and Energy [20161110100090]
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20161110100090] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A gradient-structured layer with initially nanoscale grain size increased gradually to original coarse microscale (similar to 50 mu m) was fabricated on the surface of austenitic (gamma) stainless steel SS304 via ultrasonic nanocrystallization surface modification (UNSM) peening. Modified cross-sectional and depth-specific plan-view (DSPV) sample preparation methods were explored with the analysis scales from macro to atom by synchrotron radiation XRD, EBSD, and TEM to determine the depth (strain) dependent deformation microstructures and grain refinement mechanism. The depth-dependent deformation microstructures were ascribed to strain-induced martensitic-transformed (SIMT) alpha'- and epsilon-martensite, deformation nanotwins (NT), and dislocation grids. The grain nanocrystallization mechanism was suggested as the formation of alpha' and epsilon grain boundaries that divided the original coarse grains (CG) to the nanoscale. The strains also appeared to play a key role in the crystallographic orientation relationship (OR) of the gamma/alpha': Kurdjumov-Sachs (K-S) and Pitsch in low strain region and Nishiyama-Wassermann (N-W) in the high strain region. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据